ISLMABAD: The prime minister attorney on Tuesday mentioned that his client has now not sought immunity under Article 248 and his focal point on this topic is since the petitioners have based totally their arguments on PM’s speech within the national meeting.
A 5-member higher bench of the apex court, headed through Justice Asif Saeed Khan Khosa, resumed hearing in the petitions filed via the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Jamaat-e-Islami and Awami Muslim League.
PM’s assistance Makhdoom Ali Khan pleaded that Article 19 guaranteed freedom of expression to everybody.
On this, Justice Asif Khosa reminded him that his case doesn’t fall under Article 19 and he must confine his arguments to the case. Article 19 offers you the precise to express and also you are looking for immunity, he seen.
we are not prosecuting the top minister on his speech, Justice Khosa stated.
Maryam Nawaz too, submitted reply before the courtroom relating to her dependency problem. Sharing 5-12 months tax small print, Maryam said when you consider that 1992, quickly after getting married she isn’t under her father’s dependency.
hearing a collection of petitions seeking a probe into the Panama Leaks and disqualification of the prime minister for “lying” in the nationwide assembly, the apex court on Monday had seen that it had the jurisdiction to hear the circumstances right away and had executed so up to now.
The apex court docket used to be knowledgeable that parliament could withdraw the immunity on hand to its participants; however, the apex court will have to supply its verdict within the PanamaLeaks case in keeping with the law.
persevering with his arguments, Makhdoom Ali Khan stated Article 66 of the constitution that offers legal safety to the lawsuits of parliament wherein it is evidently mentioned that the lawsuits of parliament may no longer be referred to as into query by way of any court docket.
He contended that his consumer had now not made any unsuitable statement on the floor of the house and even supposing he had, he enjoyed immunity. When the courtroom requested him if the immunity given to the individuals of parliament may be withdrawn, Makhdoom Ali Khan responded that Parliament may withdraw the immunity but even then the apex court docket will have to give its verdict in line with the regulation on the problem of disqualification of top minister for his speeches.
The court requested Makhdoom if the top minister had now not given a fallacious remark in Parliament then why he was once in search of immunity. When Justice Ijazul Ahsan asked Khan if he was contradicting the remark of his client, he said he was not contradicting the commentary of high minister however wired that the court should also seem to be into Article 66 that gives criminal protection to complaints of Parliament.